|
| |
Third Time is a Charm: Observatory in Southern California
I can remember the first telescope I got as a birthday gift
when I was in 3rd grade. It was a 3 inch Gilbert reflector. That telescope and
my first years of using it began a lifelong interest in astronomy. Except for a
period of 8 years while pursuing my education, I have pursued my hobby with a
passion and have gone through a variety instruments until finally settling on a
Celestron 14. My interest in photography began early as I attempted to
photograph the moon (mid-sixties) followed by piggyback photography (late
sixties). I continued this photography interest for many years as I lugged
around a C-11into the corn fields of Indiana and the cow pastures of South
Carolina. It was soon realized that with the purchase of a home, an observatory
would be welcome relief.
The observatory seen in the figure is the third such one I
have built during the past eight years. The first was built in South Carolina
with Jack Hall, a fellow amateur, who also built one of similar design. We
examined designs which had been published before and decided to go with the
classic roll off roof you see here with sides anchored to a 5 inch re-inforced
concrete slab and the roof on four inch wheels and secured on the inside with
adjustable gate latches. It only takes a few minutes to unhook the latches and
roll the roof back for a night of enjoyment under the sky. Since I have always
had a telescope with a fork type mount, the orientation of my original
observatory was in the north-south direction with the roof rolling off toward
the north. This resulted in the roof blocking part of the northern sky, a part
of the sky not accessible with fork mounts. This worked so well during the three
years that we lived in South Carolina that when we moved to central Indiana, the
identical type structure was built again. However, disaster was on the horizon!
Within a few months of first light, we were hit by a tornado. You can imagine my
horror, when my family and I came out of our basement to discover the roof of
the observatory scattered over several acres! Miraculously, the telescope was
still standing, dripping wet. The winds had torn the roof up and over the
telescope. The optical tube was sent back to Celestron for cleaning and new
coatings while eyepieces, drive correctors and all else such amateur essentials
were simply cleaned of "tornado debris" and allowed to dry. One might
be tempted to say "if only we had stayed in South Carolina". Not so! A
few months later, coastal South Carolina was hit by hurricane Hugo and we found
out afterwards that my old observatory likewise had its roof torn off. Three
years in Indiana and we were off again, this time for southern California. As
with our previous home purchases, I drew a forty mile radius circle around the
largest city in the area (San Diego) and told my wife and real estate agent to
look outside this circle. Fortunately, my wife Ellen understands and enjoys
country living and gardening which comes with it. However, she still cannot hear
the stars calling out to me on a clear night. We ended up in the northern part
of San Diego county only a stones throw from Mount Palomar. Once again the same
observatory design was used with some variation. We live on the side of a rather
steep hill which faces north. This forced me to tuck the observatory between
rows of our orange grove in an east-west direction with the roof rolling to the
west. By now I have gotten pretty good at putting these structures up and within
a week of having the slab poured, I was set up and in business. The total cost
of the observatory is around $1000 including the concrete and hiring someone
with a back hoe to carve out a flat area from the hill. While I may have left
tornadoes back in Indiana and hurricanes in South Carolina, California has
earthquakes and we often feel minor shakes. Even though my C-14 is on a tripod
within the observatory, it is firmly bolted to the concrete with bolts. The
skies at my observatory here in Valley Center are the best I have had of the
three. They are not necessarily the darkest although my limiting visual
magnitude is 6.5 with the lights of Los Angeles very low in the northwest (80
miles distance) while San Diego is 50 miles away toward the southwest. They are,
however, exceptionally steady. Being only 13 miles from Mount Palomar and the
Hale telescope, my site benefits with the same steady air which Palomar enjoys.
Except for the occasional Santa Ana winds that blow off the deserts from the
east, the stars just don't twinkle here and I am able to enjoy much more time at
the telescope because of the many clear nights. Further benefits of this site
over previous ones is the lack of mosquitoes and very low humidity. I've been
spoiled!
As I mentioned above, I always had a special interest in
astrophotography. In the sixties, I used tri-X and plus-X films while in the
later seventies I used the old spectroscopic films. In the early eighties when
hyper-sensitizing of film was just beginning, I began experimenting on my own.
My profession (pharmacologist) always allowed me to have easy access to good
vacuum pumps and hydrogen gas at my various places of employment. I established
my own system for hypering film with pure hydrogen gas which produced the
desired level of sensitivity and after experimenting with a variety of films
settled on tech pan 2415 (like everybody else). I found that I could hyper a 6-8
exposure roll of 2415 in the canister(no need to spool it out) in 8 days in pure
hydrogen at room temperature. By using a large glass dessicator with a vacuum
port, I could hyper 15-20 rolls at a time. I simple placed the film in the
dessicator, pumped out the air for about 15 minutes and then using a balloon
which I had filled with hydrogen, bled the gas back into the evacuated
dessicator until ambient pressure was obtained. After 8 days, the film was
removed, tested and stored away in a freezer until used. The film prepared this
way was good even after 2 years storage. For guiding I have used a Lumicon giant
easy guider. As the name implies, it is big and made guiding and finding a guide
star easy. In addition, in conjunction with the large focal reducer, it provided
an unvignetted field at f6.5 over the entire 35mm film frame. The appearance of
autoguiders (ST-4) in early 1990 was a God send for those of use doing 60-120
minute hand guided exposures. While it made astrophotography much easier, it
also points out the shortcomings in your drive system. The drive of my C-14 was
incapable of keeping the guide star on the small CCD chip, so my initial
attempts at autoguiding were fruitless. A Byers C-14 retrofit solved this
problem and soon the ST-4 became the workhorse of my astrophotography endeavors
for the next 5 years. Using this system on a steady night, I could typically
guide within a circle of 4 arc seconds for an indefinite period of time. The use
of a computer interfaced with the ST-4 greatly aided in finding a guide star and
monitoring the guidance and sky conditions. Sky fog limits my exposures to no
more than 120 minutes when working at f6.5.
I never actually took an image of an object using the ST-4.
For me, it was simply an aid for the guiding of the emulsion. The small field of
view and "grainy" appearance of the pictures obtained was no match for
hypered 2415. However, I did follow developments as they were occurring in the
CCD camera area thinking it only a matter of time and the resolution would
increase. When Meade announced their new line of cameras based on the Kodak
chips with 9 micron pixel resolution, I began to get very interested. Shortly
thereafter, SBIG announced their equivalent version with a very important novel
feature: an additional chip which allowed for simultaneous imaging and
autoguiding, I new the time had come to give this new imaging technology a try.
This web page shows some of the highlights.
|